Currently released so far... 5415 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Amsterdam
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Browse by tag
AF
AE
AJ
ASEC
AMGT
AR
AU
AG
AS
AM
AORC
AFIN
APER
ABUD
ATRN
AL
AEMR
ACOA
AO
AX
AMED
ADCO
AODE
AFFAIRS
AC
ASIG
ABLD
AA
AFU
ASUP
AROC
ATFN
AVERY
APCS
AER
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AEC
APECO
AGMT
CH
CASC
CA
CD
CV
CVIS
CMGT
CO
CI
CU
CBW
CLINTON
CE
CJAN
CIA
CG
CF
CN
CS
CAN
COUNTER
CDG
CIS
CM
CONDOLEEZZA
COE
CR
CY
CTM
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CPAS
CWC
CT
CKGR
CB
CACS
COM
CJUS
CARSON
CL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CACM
CDB
EPET
EINV
ECON
ENRG
EAID
ETRD
EG
ETTC
EFIN
EU
EAGR
ELAB
EIND
EUN
EAIR
ER
ECIN
ECPS
EFIS
EI
EINT
EZ
EMIN
ET
EC
ECONEFIN
ENVR
ES
ECA
ELN
EN
EFTA
EWWT
ELTN
EXTERNAL
EINVETC
ENIV
EINN
ENGR
EUR
ESA
ENERG
EK
ENGY
ETRO
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ESENV
ENVI
ELECTIONS
ECUN
EINVEFIN
ECIP
EINDETRD
EUC
EREL
IR
IZ
IS
IT
INTERPOL
IPR
IN
INRB
IAEA
IRAJ
INRA
INRO
IO
IC
ID
IIP
ITPHUM
IV
IWC
IQ
ICTY
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ICRC
ICAO
IMO
IF
ILC
IEFIN
INTELSAT
IL
IA
IBRD
IMF
INR
IRC
ITALY
ITALIAN
KCOR
KZ
KDEM
KN
KNNP
KPAL
KU
KWBG
KCRM
KE
KISL
KAWK
KSCA
KS
KSPR
KJUS
KFRD
KTIP
KPAO
KTFN
KIPR
KPKO
KNUC
KMDR
KGHG
KPLS
KOLY
KUNR
KDRG
KIRF
KIRC
KBIO
KHLS
KG
KACT
KGIC
KRAD
KCOM
KMCA
KV
KHDP
KVPR
KDEV
KWMN
KMPI
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMC
KTLA
KCFC
KTIA
KHIV
KPRP
KAWC
KCIP
KCFE
KOCI
KTDB
KMRS
KLIG
KBCT
KICC
KGIT
KSTC
KPAK
KNEI
KSEP
KPOA
KFLU
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KO
KTER
KSUM
KHUM
KRFD
KBTR
KDDG
KWWMN
KFLO
KSAF
KBTS
KPRV
KNPP
KNAR
KWMM
KERG
KFIN
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KTBT
KCRS
KRVC
KSTH
KREL
KNSD
KTEX
KPAI
KHSA
KR
KPWR
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KGCC
KPIN
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MTCRE
MX
MCAP
MO
MNUC
ML
MR
MZ
MPOS
MOPPS
MTCR
MAPP
MU
MY
MA
MG
MASC
MCC
MEPP
MK
MTRE
MP
MIL
MDC
MAR
MEPI
MRCRE
MI
MT
MQADHAFI
MD
MAPS
MUCN
MASSMNUC
MERCOSUR
MC
ODIP
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OEXC
OPRC
OFDP
OPDC
OTRA
OSCE
OAS
OPIC
OECD
OPCW
OSCI
OIE
OIC
OTR
OVP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
PGOV
PINR
PREL
PTER
PK
PHUM
PE
PARM
PBIO
PINS
PREF
PSOE
PBTS
PL
PHSA
PKFK
PO
PGOF
PROP
PA
PARMS
PORG
PM
PMIL
PTERE
POL
PF
PALESTINIAN
PY
PGGV
PNR
POV
PAK
PAO
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PRGOV
PNAT
PROV
PEL
PINF
PGOVE
POLINT
PRL
PRAM
PMAR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PHUS
PHUMPREL
PG
POLITICS
PEPR
PSI
PINT
PU
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PECON
POGOV
PINL
SCUL
SA
SY
SP
SNAR
SENV
SU
SW
SOCI
SL
SG
SMIG
SO
SF
SR
SN
SHUM
SZ
SYR
ST
SANC
SC
SAN
SIPRS
SK
SH
SI
SNARCS
STEINBERG
TX
TW
TU
TSPA
TH
TIP
TI
TS
TBIO
TRGY
TC
TR
TT
TERRORISM
TO
TFIN
TD
TSPL
TZ
TPHY
TK
TNGD
TINT
TRSY
TP
UK
UG
UP
UV
US
UN
UNSC
UNGA
USEU
USUN
UY
UZ
UNO
UNMIK
UNESCO
UE
UAE
UNEP
USTR
UNHCR
UNDP
UNHRC
USAID
UNCHS
UNAUS
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09PARIS381, S/WCI OFFICIALS DISCUSS GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEES
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09PARIS381.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09PARIS381 | 2009-03-16 16:04 | 2010-11-30 16:04 | SECRET//NOFORN | Embassy Paris |
VZCZCXRO3359
PP RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHNP RUEHROV
DE RUEHFR #0381/01 0751623
ZNY SSSSS ZZH (CCY AD40E4BD MSI7190-632)
P 161623Z MAR 09 ZDS
FM AMEMBASSY PARIS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5776
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
SS E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 02 PARIS 000381
NOFORN
SIPDIS
C O R R E C T E D C O P Y FOR MISSING NOFORN CAPTION
E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/15/2019
TAGS: PREL PGOV PTER PHUM MOPS KAWK KISL KPAO FR
SUBJECT: S/WCI OFFICIALS DISCUSS GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEES
WITH FRENCH OFFICIALS
REF: PARIS 264
PARIS 00000381 001.3 OF 002
Classified By: Acting POL MC W. William Jordan for reasons 1.4 (B & D).
¶1. (S/NF) SUMMARY: France accepted four former Guantanamo Bay
(GITMO) detainees with claims to immigration status in France
in July 2004 and an additional three in March 2005. Ministry
of Interior contact Christophe Chaboud noted that, unlike
other European countries visited by Washington officials (UK
and Albania), the majority of detainees repatriated by France
are still considered a security risk and are treated as such.
With the exception of the one detainee released without
prejudice (out of seven detainees repatriated), the French
intelligence service actively monitors the others and judges
they have not ceased association with persons tied to
extremist activities. France is still working to advance the
detainee issue within the EU and is considering accepting
detainees (reftel). French MFA DAS-equivalent for security
affairs Martin Juillard and Laurent Pic of Prime Minister
Fillon's office stressed that an EU common position would be
of "clear interest" to the USG, warning that countries might
attempt to "cherry pick" detainees if a framework were not in
place. Juillard added that a common approach would also
create a more fluid process for moving detainees. France
would appreciate as much information as possible from the USG
to help push the issue within the EU and in securing French
public support. Pic noted the mid-March meetings in
Washington with EU Vice President Jacques Barrot and the
Czech minister of interior could help to resolve many of
these issues. END SUMMARY.
French Approach to Detainee Reintegration
-----------------------------------------
¶2. (S/NF) France accepted four former detainees with claims
to immigration status in France in July 2004 and an
additional three in March 2005. In a March 10 meeting with
Ministry of Interior contacts Christophe Chaboud, Phillippe
Hanin and Francois Thuillier, and Ministry of Justice
official Philippe Tran Van, Chaboud noted that, unlike the UK
and Albania, the majority of detainees repatriated by France
are still considered a security risk and are treated as such.
Of the seven detainees originally repatriated, only Mustaq
Ali Patel was released without prejudice. Chaboud explained
that Patel was a religious fundamentalist who had been held
by the Taliban and was not deemed to be a threat. The six
other former detainees were held in custody and tried. Five
were convicted and sentenced to prison terms ranging from one
to one and half years. Chaboud explained that while all six
of the detainees were considered extremists, only five had
trained in terrorist training camps. An appeals court
overturned the conviction of the five on February 24, saying
the security services who interviewed the defendants at GITMO
did not have the legal authority to do so. Although the
court case is ongoing and it is unclear if the reversal will
stand, the French security services will continue to monitor
the former detainees regardless of the final outcome of the
legal battle. The French intelligence service explained that
they actively monitor the repatriated detainees. Philippe
Hanin said that France still considers the six former
detainees a security risk. When pressed, Hanin added that
the detainee of greatest concern is Brahim Yadel, whose
history of large wire transfers has worried investigators
(Yadel was also suspected of plotting to attack the 1998
football World Cup in France).
EU Common Position: Still in Process
-------------------------------------
¶3. (S/NF) French MFA DAS-equivalent for security affairs
Martin Juillard and Laurent Pic of Prime Minister Fillon's
office clarified the evolving EU approach to a common
position for accepting Guantanamo detainees. While an EU
common position has still not been established, France has
been working with EU partners since January 2009 to formulate
a position that would take into consideration security
issues, especially for Schengen countries (reftel). Pic
noted that previous EU acceptance of Palestinians from the
Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem (reftel) could serve as a
useful precedent for granting residency permits within the
Schengen system. Pic added that the discussions within the
EU are still quite difficult; the French are looking for ways
to put in place a procedure for accepting detainees while not
pressuring countries that are unwilling to resettle them.
¶4. (S/NF) Juillard explained that an EU common position would
be of "clear interest" to the USG to avoid "cherry picking"
by EU countries willing to accept detainees as well as
creating a more fluid process for moving detainees. That
said, Pic noted that there were some EU members --
unspecified -- still resistant to the idea of accepting
detainees. For this reason the GOF would appreciate as much
PARIS 00000381 002.2 OF 002
information as possible from the USG to help push the issue
within the EU and to secure French public support. Some of
the EU debate over a common position, Juillard said, needed
to focus on forming some procedures to create contingency
plans when a detainee's first choice of accepting country is
refused by that country. Perhaps, he suggested, the GOF, EU
and USG could work together collectively to craft a mechanism
for other EU countries to help fill the void. Juillard and
Pic noted that the idea of a clearing house (reftel) as part
of a common position was intended to provide a data-sharing
mechanism rather than as a forum for collective
decision-making, which the French believe would hinder the
decision-making process.
Increased Coordination and Additional Issues
--------------------------------------------
¶5. (S/NF) Juillard said the GOF needed to know the status of
the USG's review process. He noted that since Prime Minister
Fillon and Foreign Minister Kouchner announced that France
would consider accepting detainees (reftel), French public
opinion has continued to sour. France realizes that the
issue will be a tough sell to the French public, so any help
the U.S. can provide to assist the GOF with selling the idea
to the French public would be greatly appreciated. Another
"sensitive" concern for the French is the possibility of
extradition of former Guantanamo Bay detainees as well as
prosecutions and detentions, Juillard said. In addition, the
French would like to have more information on reintegration
procedures so that detainees did not resume terrorist
activities. Such procedures could be legal and financial.
Before France could consider accepting detainees, the GOF
would like to interview the detainees in such a way that
would "not cause" legal problems, Juillard said. Pic said
France and the EU hope many of these issues will be resolved
during the mid-March meetings in Washington with EU Vice
President Jacques Barrot and Czech Minister of Interior
Langer.
PEKALA