Currently released so far... 5415 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Amsterdam
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Browse by tag
AF
AE
AJ
ASEC
AMGT
AR
AU
AG
AS
AM
AORC
AFIN
APER
ABUD
ATRN
AL
AEMR
ACOA
AO
AX
AMED
ADCO
AODE
AFFAIRS
AC
ASIG
ABLD
AA
AFU
ASUP
AROC
ATFN
AVERY
APCS
AER
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AEC
APECO
AGMT
CH
CASC
CA
CD
CV
CVIS
CMGT
CO
CI
CU
CBW
CLINTON
CE
CJAN
CIA
CG
CF
CN
CS
CAN
COUNTER
CDG
CIS
CM
CONDOLEEZZA
COE
CR
CY
CTM
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CPAS
CWC
CT
CKGR
CB
CACS
COM
CJUS
CARSON
CL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CACM
CDB
EPET
EINV
ECON
ENRG
EAID
ETRD
EG
ETTC
EFIN
EU
EAGR
ELAB
EIND
EUN
EAIR
ER
ECIN
ECPS
EFIS
EI
EINT
EZ
EMIN
ET
EC
ECONEFIN
ENVR
ES
ECA
ELN
EN
EFTA
EWWT
ELTN
EXTERNAL
EINVETC
ENIV
EINN
ENGR
EUR
ESA
ENERG
EK
ENGY
ETRO
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ESENV
ENVI
ELECTIONS
ECUN
EINVEFIN
ECIP
EINDETRD
EUC
EREL
IR
IZ
IS
IT
INTERPOL
IPR
IN
INRB
IAEA
IRAJ
INRA
INRO
IO
IC
ID
IIP
ITPHUM
IV
IWC
IQ
ICTY
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ICRC
ICAO
IMO
IF
ILC
IEFIN
INTELSAT
IL
IA
IBRD
IMF
INR
IRC
ITALY
ITALIAN
KCOR
KZ
KDEM
KN
KNNP
KPAL
KU
KWBG
KCRM
KE
KISL
KAWK
KSCA
KS
KSPR
KJUS
KFRD
KTIP
KPAO
KTFN
KIPR
KPKO
KNUC
KMDR
KGHG
KPLS
KOLY
KUNR
KDRG
KIRF
KIRC
KBIO
KHLS
KG
KACT
KGIC
KRAD
KCOM
KMCA
KV
KHDP
KVPR
KDEV
KWMN
KMPI
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMC
KTLA
KCFC
KTIA
KHIV
KPRP
KAWC
KCIP
KCFE
KOCI
KTDB
KMRS
KLIG
KBCT
KICC
KGIT
KSTC
KPAK
KNEI
KSEP
KPOA
KFLU
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KO
KTER
KSUM
KHUM
KRFD
KBTR
KDDG
KWWMN
KFLO
KSAF
KBTS
KPRV
KNPP
KNAR
KWMM
KERG
KFIN
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KTBT
KCRS
KRVC
KSTH
KREL
KNSD
KTEX
KPAI
KHSA
KR
KPWR
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KGCC
KPIN
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MTCRE
MX
MCAP
MO
MNUC
ML
MR
MZ
MPOS
MOPPS
MTCR
MAPP
MU
MY
MA
MG
MASC
MCC
MEPP
MK
MTRE
MP
MIL
MDC
MAR
MEPI
MRCRE
MI
MT
MQADHAFI
MD
MAPS
MUCN
MASSMNUC
MERCOSUR
MC
ODIP
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OEXC
OPRC
OFDP
OPDC
OTRA
OSCE
OAS
OPIC
OECD
OPCW
OSCI
OIE
OIC
OTR
OVP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
PGOV
PINR
PREL
PTER
PK
PHUM
PE
PARM
PBIO
PINS
PREF
PSOE
PBTS
PL
PHSA
PKFK
PO
PGOF
PROP
PA
PARMS
PORG
PM
PMIL
PTERE
POL
PF
PALESTINIAN
PY
PGGV
PNR
POV
PAK
PAO
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PRGOV
PNAT
PROV
PEL
PINF
PGOVE
POLINT
PRL
PRAM
PMAR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PHUS
PHUMPREL
PG
POLITICS
PEPR
PSI
PINT
PU
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PECON
POGOV
PINL
SCUL
SA
SY
SP
SNAR
SENV
SU
SW
SOCI
SL
SG
SMIG
SO
SF
SR
SN
SHUM
SZ
SYR
ST
SANC
SC
SAN
SIPRS
SK
SH
SI
SNARCS
STEINBERG
TX
TW
TU
TSPA
TH
TIP
TI
TS
TBIO
TRGY
TC
TR
TT
TERRORISM
TO
TFIN
TD
TSPL
TZ
TPHY
TK
TNGD
TINT
TRSY
TP
UK
UG
UP
UV
US
UN
UNSC
UNGA
USEU
USUN
UY
UZ
UNO
UNMIK
UNESCO
UE
UAE
UNEP
USTR
UNHCR
UNDP
UNHRC
USAID
UNCHS
UNAUS
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09SANJOSE499, COSTA RICA: SHIP VISITS IN A TIME OF INFLUENZA
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09SANJOSE499.
VZCZCXYZ0000
PP RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0499/01 1681920
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 171920Z JUN 09
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0936
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHMFISS/DIRJIATF SOUTH PRIORITY
RHMFIUU/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUWDQAC/COMDT COGARD WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUCOWCV/CCGDSEVEN MIAMI FL PRIORITY
RUWDQAA/CCGDELEVEN ALAMEDA CA PRIORITY
RXFEAH/COMNAVSOUTH PRIORITY
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000499
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR WHA/CEN, WHA/PPC AND P/M
SOUTHCOM ALSO FOR FPA
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL PGOV MASS MARR SNAR CS
SUBJECT: COSTA RICA: SHIP VISITS IN A TIME OF INFLUENZA
REF: A. San Jose-SOUTHCOM JAG email of 6/2/2009 (NOTAL)
¶B. San Jose-WHA/CEN email of 5/22/2009 (NOTAL)
¶C. 2009 San Jose 947 (NOTAL)
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY: USN and USCG ship visits to Costa Rica should now
be able to resume, thanks to an agreement reached June 2 with the
GOCR on the use of a health questionnaire introduced to track
possible H1N1 cases. Starting in mid-May, the Health Ministry had
insisted that disembarking crew members complete and sign the
questionnaire, which is required of all visitors to Costa Rica.
Because providing such personal information to a foreign government
violates USN policy, Navy ship visits were suspended.
Atlantic-based (District 7) USCG vessels followed suit. The
curtailed visit of the USS Kauffman (FFG 59) to Limon highlighted
the problem, generating negative publicity and political pressure
which may have persuaded the Health Minister to accept a compromise.
As of June 2, disembarking USN and USCG crew members must still
complete the H1N1 questionnaire, but they may use a number from a
ship's roster to identify themselves; no names or signatures will be
required. The GOCR will not see the roster, which would be retained
by the CO. As long as the Health Ministry can contact the ship or
relevant USN and USCG authorities later, should there be H1N1 cases
possibly related to a ship visit, then that will be sufficient for
the GOCR. The test case will be the next port call, but we are
hopeful that USN and USCG ship visits, important and tangible
examples of U.S.-Costa Rica civilian-military cooperation, will
continue unimpeded. END SUMMARY
----------
BACKGROUND
----------
¶2. (SBU) U.S. ship visits to Costa Rica have long been complicated
by two factors. The first is the strict interpretation of the 1949
constitutional requirement that the national legislature approve
visits in advance by "armed" vessels (including USCG cutters). The
second is the long-running and well-known Costa Rican sensitivity to
foreign military presence or activities. Since a bilateral maritime
cooperation agreement was concluded in 1998, and the USG helped
equip the Costa Rican coast guard in 1999-2001, we have gradually
overcome most Costa Rica concerns about USCG visits; legislators and
the public generally understand coast guard-to-coast guard
cooperation.
¶3. (SBU) Visits by USN vessels have remained more problematic, again
due to two factors. On the Costa Rican side, some (mostly
opposition) legislators still complain about "warships" putting into
Costa Rican ports. On the USG side, USN force protection concerns
mandate that no personal information (i.e., crew lists, crew member
signatures or SSNs) can be provided to a foreign government.
Because Costa Rican immigration authorities normally require such
information, USN ship visits to Costa Rica became very rare.
¶4. (SBU) Through steady, quiet diplomacy, we have worked through
most of these problems. The Embassy, NAVSOUTH and the GOCR
(Immigration Directorate) crafted a local solution which addressed
the immigration and force protection concerns. Despite some
reluctance when the peace-promoting Arias administration took office
in 2006, VIP visits to USN and USCG vessels, regular briefings to
senior GOCR personnel and key legislators, and two visits by GOCR
security ministers to SOUTHCOM and JIATF-South abated most
suspicions and misunderstandings about the Navy's role in support of
counternarcotics and law enforcement missions. Indicative of the
progress, there were 23 USCG and four USN port visits to Costa Rica
in 2008. One of those, to Golfito in November, featured a VIP visit
to the USS Underwood (FFG 36), replete with briefings and a boarding
demonstration for the Minister of Public Security and key
legislators, including members of the opposition. The Kauffman's
visit was the first official port call by a USN warship to Costa
Rica in nine years (Ref C.)
---------------------
THE KAUFFMAN "CRISIS"
---------------------
¶5. (SBU) The H1N1 crisis seemed to threaten much of that progress,
with the first cases in Central America appearing in Costa Rica. To
help deal with the crisis, the Ministry of Health introduced a
mandatory questionnaire in May for everyone arriving from abroad to
Costa Rica; the questionnaire is intended to identify anyone who may
be carrying/have been exposed to the influenza, and to help track
them later, should new outbreaks occur in the country. The
international airports are using the questionnaire, cruise ship
passengers are supposed to, and the Health Ministry expected the
crews of visiting USCG or USN vessels to do the same. The USS Gary
(FFG-51) and the USS Carr (FFG-52) were able to visit Golfito (on
the Pacific coast) in early May before the H1N1 questionnaire was
fully in use, providing important training opportunities for the
Costa Rican coast guard and conducting some community relations
activities.
¶6. (SBU) The visit of the USS Kauffman was a different story,
however. The ship was to make a long-planned stop in Limon, Costa
Rica's major Caribbean port, May 19-23. As one of the neediest
areas of Costa Rica, and a development priority of the Arias
administration, Limon was deliberately targeted for the visit, the
first by a USN vessel to that city since 2006. The crew was
prepared for fairly extensive community relations activities, and
the community was prepared to welcome them (thanks to Embassy public
diplomacy preparations). We were also preparing a VIP visit to the
ship so that additional legislators could see the U.S. Navy first
hand. The Health Ministry insisted that the H1N1 questionnaire be
used for this visit.
¶7. (SBU) Despite numerous approaches to the Ministry (and up to
Health Minister Maria Luisa Avila herself), and extensive
behind-the-scenes discussions with SOUTHCOM, NAVSOUTH, Navy JAG reps
and even staff in the office of the Chief of Naval Operations in
Washington, a compromise was not reached. Avila held firm that the
questionnaire had to be used, signed and delivered to local GOCR
officials for the ship's crew members, just as for any international
traveler; no one could disembark from the Kauffman without the form.
With the crew unable to leave the ship because of the standoff, the
Kauffman departed on May 21 without conducting the hoped-for
community relations activities.
¶8. (U) Local media gave the shortened visit prominent coverage,
fairly accurately explaining the rules on both sides which had led
to the impasse, but highlighting (thanks to Embassy-provided
details) the opportunity lost for the community. Pro-U.S. and
pro-ship visit legislator Federico Tinoco, Chairman of the
Counternarcotics Committee, excoriated Minister Avila for not being
more flexible. Until the issue could be resolved, all USN ship
visits to Costa Rica were suspended. Atlantic-based (District 7)
USCG vessels followed suit.
-------------------------
HELPS GENERATE A SOLUTION
-------------------------
¶9. (SBU) The publicity and the political pressure may have made an
impact. When the DCM, Acting ODR Chief and Pol/Econ Counselor
called on Avila June 2, she and Vice Minister Ana Cecilia Morice
were very appreciative of on-going USG support and assistance to
Costa Rica, including ship visits, overall counternarcotics
cooperation and CDC help during the H1N1 crisis. Clearly willing to
find a ship visit solution that took into account USN security
concerns, the Minister herself suggested a version of one of the
options earlier suggested by SOUTHCOM JAG. Visiting USN (or USCG)
crew members would fill-in the H1N1 health questionnaire, but they
would use a number to identify themselves and would not have to sign
the form. Using an identification number would be sufficient to
identify crew members later, if needed, and this number would not be
anything official; SSNs or military ID numbers would not be
required. Instead, a visiting ship's CO would keep a simple list of
which crew member had which number, and the GOCR would not see this
list. The numbering could be as basic as 1-200, if a ship's company
numbered that many; the GOCR did not care about the format, Avila
explained.
¶10. (U) Avila made clear that the following were the two most
important issues for the GOCR:
-- all disembarking crew had to fill in the health data on the
questionnaire, in keeping with "international standards," and as a
"self-diagnostic" to consider seriously whether or not they had
exhibited influenza symptoms; and
-- there must be some means to track the crew members later, in the
event of an outbreak possible linked to them. In that instance, the
GOCR would ask the Embassy to check with the ship (or relevant USN
and USCG authorities) to identify the crew members (using the list
kept by the CO) who may have been infected or may have infected
others.
¶11. (SBU) In response to our questions, the Minister reiterated
that no signatures or crew lists would be required. She suggested
that, following the procedure used with cruise ships, any
disembarking crew member could download the GOCR questionnaire from
the internet and fill it out the night before leaving the ship.
This would speed and simplify disembarking procedures. She added
that one questionnaire per disembarking crew member would be
sufficient for a given visit, even if the crew member got on and off
the ship a number of times. Crew members that were not leaving the
ship at all would not have to fill in the form.
-----------------------------------
GOCR EXPLANATION (AND JUSTIFICATION)
-----------------------------------
¶12. (SBU) The Minister said she was in close contact with the
Pan-American Health Organization, which was on the verge of
upgrading its H1N1 alert, because of the continued spread of cases.
Avila said she expected to see more cases in the United States, and
more in Costa Rica, as the local flu season continues. As she met
with us, her Chilean counterpart emailed her to announce the first
confirmed H1N1 death in Chile. Under these circumstances, Avila
said the GOCR was compelled to leave its H1N1 "tracking mechanism"
(the questionnaire) in place, even for U.S. Navy and Coast Guard
vessels, but she was hopeful the USG would accept her suggestion.
We said we'd confer with SOUTHCOM and Washington and get back to
her. The Vice Minister hoped we could agree quickly enough to
resume US ship visits before the end of June. (NOTE: Avila's
predictions proved correct. The WHO upgraded the global H1N1
outbreak to pandemic status on June 11, and as of June 15, 149 cases
had been confirmed in Costa Rica.)
-------
COMMENT
-------
¶13. (SBU) We understand that NAVSOUTH, SOUTHCOM and Coast Guard
District 7 have all accepted Avila's compromise; this is very good
news. It is also well-timed, as the national legislature is about
to vote on the slate of possible USN and USCG ship visits to Costa
Rica scheduled from July-December. From a distance, Avila's initial
(stubborn) stance may have seemed like another case of Tico
hyper-legalism. The highly-regarded minister continues to handle
the H1N1 crisis here well, however, and because of this no doubt
found it difficult at first to make an exception (or to appear to
have made an exception) for the U.S. Navy. The test case will be
the next port call, but we are hopeful that these important and
tangible examples of U.S.-Costa Rica civilian-military cooperation
will continue unimpeded. We say "bring 'em on," with gratitude to
all levels of the USN and USCG hierarchy which helped with this
solution. Our special thanks go to the crews of the Kauffman and
her sister ships for their energetic (and flexible) support for key
Mission objectives here.
CIANCHETTE